Why that matters more in travel, leisure and entertainment than most sectors
The debate around CRM vs CCaaS is growing. We’re often asked a question that, on the surface, makes complete sense. “We already have a CRM and a telephony partner — why would we need anything else?”
For many travel, leisure and entertainment organisations reviewing their customer experience technology, this feels like a reasonable position. Significant investment has already gone into CRM systems, booking platforms and telephony infrastructure. Customer data is captured and maintained. Bookings, payments and enquiries are tracked. Service teams are experienced and deeply committed to delivering high standards of support, often in environments where expectations are deliberately set high.
And yet, despite all of this, friction still appears — usually at exactly the wrong moments. When customers are already travelling. Already at the venue. Already emotionally invested in an experience they’ve paid a premium for.
That tension is rarely about a lack of systems. More often, it’s about how customer experience is orchestrated in real time.
In sectors driven by experience rather than transactions, CX is not defined by how well things work when everything goes to plan. It is defined by how confidently and calmly an organisation responds when something changes, something goes wrong, or something unexpected happens. Those moments are time-critical, emotionally charged and increasingly complex — especially when customers are international or moving between locations.
This is where many organisations feel a gap between CRM capability and customer experience delivery, even if they don’t articulate it in those terms. They know who their customers are. They know what those customers have purchased. They know what should happen next.
What’s harder is deciding how best to respond in the moment — across channels, teams and systems — without creating effort for the customer or strain for the people delivering the service.
What a CRM is designed to do – and what it isn’t
A CRM system is not the problem here. In fact, it is doing exactly what it was designed to do. A CRM is excellent at providing structure, memory and continuity over time. It offers a reliable record of customer relationships, interactions and transactions, and it supports long-term workflows extremely well.
What a CRM was never designed to do is manage live customer experience. It does not assess urgency, prioritise emotion or determine whether a customer requires immediate human reassurance rather than another automated response. It can tell you what has happened. It does not orchestrate what should happen next.
That distinction matters far more in the travel, leisure and entertainment space than in many other sectors.
Here, customer contact does not sit outside the experience — it wraps around it. A delayed response, a confusing payment issue or a lack of clarity at the wrong moment does not simply feel inefficient. It undermines the very experience the organisation has worked so hard to create.
Where CCaaS changes the customer experience
This is where Contact Centre as a Service (CCaaS) is often misunderstood. It is still commonly viewed as a cloud replacement for on-premise telephony, when its real value lies elsewhere.
CCaaS operates at the point of interaction. It shapes how customers enter the organisation, how context travels between channels, and how demand is prioritised when pressure is highest. It does not replace personal service; it determines whether personal service can be delivered consistently and calmly at scale.
In premium travel, leisure and entertainment environments, this becomes critical. Customers may be overseas. Payments may need rapid authorisation. Demand may spike without warning. Expectations are rarely forgiving.
When those pressures collide, customer experience is no longer defined by how well systems store information, but by how intelligently they support decisions in real time.
The risk of relying on people to bridge the CX gap
Many organisations in these sectors already deliver remarkable service — largely because of the people involved. Highly trained teams, often with deep product knowledge and strong customer relationships, step in to resolve issues, reassure customers and protect the experience.
But too often, that excellence exists despite the CX environment rather than because of it.
Context lives in people’s heads. Workarounds become normal. The quality of the experience depends heavily on who happens to answer the call or message. As demand increases or situations grow more complex, that model begins to strain.
This is not a people problem. It is an orchestration problem.
Travel, leisure and entertainment are emotional purchases. Customers are buying anticipation, enjoyment and memories — not just access or logistics. That dramatically changes tolerance for friction. A single poor interaction can outweigh many good ones, particularly when it occurs at a moment of stress or uncertainty.
When experience breaks down in these sectors, it feels personal — not procedural.
CRM and CCaaS are complementary – not competing
This is why framing CRM vs CCaaS as competing technologies misses the point. They serve different purposes and are strongest when connected intelligently. A CRM provides structure and memory. CCaaS provides real-time orchestration and responsiveness. Together, they allow organisations to maintain continuity, reduce customer effort and deliver reassurance when it matters most.
At IPI, we approach this through the lens of Practical Intelligence. Not adding complexity for its own sake, and not chasing technology trends, but focusing on what genuinely improves customer experience and working conditions for teams. That usually means asking harder questions about where friction actually appears — and whether existing systems are designed to handle those moments calmly and confidently.
The real question is not whether you already have a CRM.
It is whether your customer experience platform can keep up when expectations are high, emotion is involved and the moment truly matters.
